But, let’s be honest, hardly one cares if a smartphone was the first or the last to be released when making a purchase choice. What counts is how it functions in real life and whether it is a feasible alternative for the typical customer.
That being said, it’s exciting to see gaming devices still in use in 2024. Most flagship smartphones now provide the same level of performance as well as a few added bonuses, such as much improved cameras.
These gaming phones may not have the best camera hardware or algorithms, but they guarantee high-quality performance for a low price. So, to put this promise to the test, I utilised both the iQOO 13 and the realme GT 7 Pro for a few weeks, and I have some interesting findings to offer.
I’ll be comparing the display, performance, battery, and everything else you’re thinking about right now, as well as things you’re not thinking about. Continue reading and you will see what I mean.
iQOO 13 vs. Realme GT 7 Pro: The Specifications
Let’s quickly review the specifications of the iQOO 13 and the realme GT 7 Pro before we get started. I’ve created a table so you can quickly compare everything in order to keep things easy for both of us:
| iQOO 13 | realme GT 7 Pro | |
| Display | 6.82-inch BOE Q10 OLED, 2,592 Hz PWM, 3168×1440, 510 PPI, 4500 Nits peak, 144 Hz refresh, Schott Xensation Alpha | 6.78-inch LTPO Samsung AMOLED, 120 Hz, 6500 Nits peak, 2780×1264, 450 PPI, Gorilla Glass 7i, Dolby Vision |
| SoC | Snapdragon 8 Elite (2x 4.32 GHz Oryon Phoenix L, 6x 3.53 GHz Oryon Phoenix M, Adreno 830, 3nm) + SuperComputing Chip Q2 | Snapdragon 8 Elite (2x 4.32 GHz Oryon Phoenix L, 6x 3.53 GHz Oryon Phoenix M, Adreno 830, 3nm) |
| RAM | 12/16 GB LPDDR5X Ultra | 12/16 GB LPDDR5X |
| Storage | 256/512 GB UFS 4.1 | 256/512 GB UFS 4.0 |
| Main Camera | 50 MP Sony IMX921, 1/1.56-inch, f/1.88, OIS, Laser AF, 8K24, 4K30/60 | 50 MP Sony IMX906, 1/1.56-inch, f/1.8, OIS, PDAF, 24mm, 8K30, 4K30/60 HDR |
| Ultra-wide Camera | 50 MP Samsung JN5, 1/2.76-inch, f/2.0, AF, 120°, 4K30/60 | 8 MP Sony IMX355, 1/4-inch, f/2.2, 16mm |
| Telephoto/Periscope | 50 MP Sony IMX816, 1/2.93-inch, f/1.85, 2x optical, 50mm | 50 MP Sony IMX882, 1/1.95-inch, f/2.65, OIS, 3x optical, 73mm, 4K30/60 HDR |
| Front Camera | 32 MP GalaxyCore GC32E1_PD2408, 1/3.15-inch, f/2.45, 28mm, 4K30/60 | 16 MP Sony IMX480, 1/3.1-inch, f/2.45, 24mm, 1080p30 |
| Speakers | Dual-stereo speakers, LDAC only | Stereo speakers with earpiece, LHDC/LDAC |
| Battery and Charging | 6,000 mAh, 120W Flash Charge, PD support | 5,800 mAh, 120W SUPERVOOC, PD |
| IP Rating | IP68/IP69 | IP69 (2m for 30 minutes) |
| Connectivity | 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, 360-degree NFC | 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC |
| Biometrics | Under-display ultrasonic fingerprint, 2D face unlock | Under-display ultrasonic fingerprint, 2D face unlock |
| Weight | 213g (Legend), 207g (Nardo Grey) | 223g |
| Build | Glass back, metal frame | Glass back with Panda glass protection, metal frame |
| Additional Features | Monster Halo Light | – |
iQOO 13 vs. Realme GT 7 Pro: Cameras
The iQOO 13 and realme GT 7 Pro may appear identical on paper, but the design variations are evident when you handle them. The iQOO 13 seems significantly lighter at 213 grammes, making it more comfortable for extended usage, whilst the realme GT 7 Pro feels a little heavier at 223 grammes, but you’ll grow used to it over time. The realme appears to be somewhat broader, which makes it less pleasant to carry for extended lengths of time.
The displays are where the two diverge most. The realme GT 7 Pro features a quad-curved display that feels expensive, especially when swiping from the edges or pulling down fast settings.
The iQOO 13, on the other hand, maintains a flat display, which is more utilitarian but less premium. If, like me, you value aesthetics and a more immersive experience, realme’s curved display may appeal to you.
Colour selections also reflect their design beliefs. The iQOO 13 comes in white and grey, which are not very flamboyant, but realme opts for orange and dark grey, which some may find excessively aggressive. I also prefer the iQOO’s overall design over the realme’s.
Speaking of which, the Monster Halo Light on the iQOO 13 is really eye-catching. I’ve had numerous folks ask me about the iQOO 13 just due of the Monster Halo Light. While it may not be for everyone (including me), gamers and those who enjoy bright designs may find it appealing.
Both phones are relatively durable. The realme GT 7 Pro utilises Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, whilst the iQOO 13 uses SCHOTT Xensation Glass. Both are IP69 certified, but the iQOO includes IP68 for further protection.
Both feature matte surfaces on the back to keep fingerprints at bay. Also, realme’s buttons have significantly superior haptics, even though iQOO’s are more exact in general. The change isn’t huge, but it’s there.
The iQOO 13 outperforms in practical features like as ports and NFC. It contains a USB 3.2 connector, which is quicker for data transfer and screen projection than realme’s obsolete USB 2.0.
The iQOO 13 also includes 360-degree NFC, which is far more convenient. Both phones include IR blasters and well-placed buttons, but the iQOO 13 has additional antenna bands, which improves connectivity.
Finally, the iQOO 13 seems more polished, thanks to its lightweight construction, functional functions, and enhanced looks. However, if you value a quad-curved display and enjoy realme’s design, the realme GT 7 Pro may still be worth considering.
iQOO 13 vs. realme GT 7 Pro: Display, Sound, and resolution
Interesting information are revealed by comparing the displays of the iQOO 13 and realme GT 7 Pro. The iQOO 13 chooses a flat BOE Q10 LTPO display, whereas the realme GT 7 Pro has a quad-curved Samsung LTPO panel.
Although both screens are incredibly brilliant, the realme shines brighter with a peak brightness of 2,000 Nits, while the iQOO 13’s HBM (highest maximum global) brightness is just lower. In addition, realme boasts an astounding 6,500 Nits of peak HDR brightness, which is useless in real-world applications.
With a resolution of 2K, the iQOO 13 outperforms the realme, which has a resolution of 1.5K. In everyday usage, though, it is difficult to tell the difference in sharpness unless you pay great attention. The realme GT 7 Pro has a slightly broader display than the others, but they are also about the same size. Depending on who you ask, this may or may not be a good thing.
In normal use, the iQOO 13 provides 130 Hz, and in game mode, 300 Hz. No, the stated 2000 Hz sampling rate was never reached. Although the realme’s display’s touch sampling rate isn’t stated, I thought it was as nice.
The implementation of LTPO is one significant distinction. While realme’s LTPO function only operates in extremely bright situations, such as direct sunshine, the iQOO 13’s LTPO technology works in all lighting conditions, making it more power-efficient. It is really frustrating that the realme remains frozen at 120 Hz or 60 Hz whether indoors or in well-lit locations.
With a yellowish tinge, the iQOO 13 tends towards bright, oversaturated colours that pop yet can feel artificial. When the video is shot and played on the iQOO 13, the colours appear oversaturated; however, when it is played on a PC, the colours appear normal. Clearly, the problem is with the display calibration.
However, realme opts for a more natural, well-balanced colour scheme that seems more authentic. Since I am more of an earphone user when it comes to watching material on smartphones, it goes without saying that I preferred viewing multimedia on the realme GT 7 Pro.
Both gadgets include features that safeguard the eyes. The iQOO 13 improves upon the realme GT 7 Pro’s 2,160 Hz PWM dimming with 2,592 Hz PWM dimming for less flicker. For further security, the iQOO also has TÜV Rheinland and other certifications.
Both phones include stereo speakers, however the iQOO 13 has a dedicated stereo speaker arrangement, while the realme GT 7 Pro uses the earpiece as a secondary speaker. Though both work well for me in daily use, I thought the iQOO 13 had somewhat superior sound quality, with cleaner and more immersive sound. However, certain gamers might choose the realme GT 7 Pro’s speakers.
The realme GT 7 Pro offers good haptics, however the iQOO 13 provides more accurate feedback, particularly while typing. Although it’s not as wonderful as the Pixels, it’s still excellent. The haptics on both devices let me down.
iQOO 13 vs. Realme GT 7 Pro: Sensor and Connectivity
When it comes to biometric security, the iQOO 13 and realme GT 7 Pro include ultrasonic fingerprint scanners and 2D face unlock. As we all know, the 2D face unlock function performs poorly in low light, which may be irritating.
However, both devices work similarly with the ultrasonic fingerprint scanner. The realme GT 7 Pro has Qualcomm’s second-generation ultrasonic scanner, whilst the iQOO 13 employs a Chinese manufacturer’s ultrasonic fingerprint reader.
Both are comparable, however the realme scanner has a slightly wider area, making it a little more handy. Furthermore, registering your fingerprint on the realme is faster, requiring only 4-5 hits, whereas the iQOO 13 takes more (10-15 pushes), akin to an optical scanner. Still, it’s an upgrade over the optical sensor, so it gets a pass.
During my testing, both smartphones functioned well in terms of connectivity, with no difficulties using a Jio SIM card or connecting to Wi-Fi. However, the iQOO 13 periodically has difficulty connecting to Wi-Fi, necessitating a reset. This occurred around three times throughout my usage, so keep that in mind. Aside from that, the iQOO offers marginally improved connection overall.
When it comes to microphones, I found the realme GT 7 Pro to be somewhat better at picking up my voice, whether I was close to it or a little further away. The audio from the realme was clearer, albeit the difference was not significant. Unless you’re in a really loud environment, both smartphones function admirably in this regard.
iQOO 13 vs. Realme GT 7 Pro: Software
When it comes to software, I prefer Realme’s skin to iQOO’s. The iQOO 13 runs Funtouch OS 15 on top of Android 15, whilst the realme GT 7 Pro uses realme UI 6.0 on top of Android 15. So, of course, both devices run the most recent version of Android and are loaded with AI functions.
Both have Circle to Search, Gemini, and the standard Google AI capabilities. Realme’s software features AI call transcription after a call, but iQOO provides real-time call transcription and translation, which I prefer, especially because it is also accessible in Hindi.
Needless to add, realme provides more AI capabilities for picture editing, including AI Ultra Clarity, AI Eraser, AI Unblur, and AI Sketch to Image. In comparison, iQOO has only one AI Eraser.
The realme GT 7 Pro also includes AI Writer, AI Summary, AI Speak, and AI Studio, which allows you to create AI portraits. This is missing from the iQOO 13. If you love these AI features, the Realme GT 7 Pro is the best choice for you.
On the design front, realme UI is more polished, contemporary, and visually appealing. It’s visually unified and sophisticated, making it enjoyable to use. In comparison, iQOO’s Funtouch OS 15 features a more polarising design that does not appear as clean or current.
Funtouch OS 15 includes several important features, such as an improved Do Not Disturb (DND) mode, but the overall UI design is not as beautiful or appealing as realme UI. It is smooth, although not as fluid as Realme UI 6.0.
However, one area where iQOO has an edge is in software upgrades. iQOO provides 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates, whereas realme only offers 3 years of OS updates and 4 years of security updates.
Customisation is another great point of realme UI. The Flux themes include significant customisation options, including the ability to change typefaces (excellent ones with weights), app icons, conceal status bar icons, and much more. The first-party widgets are also far better.
The iQOO 13, on the other hand, only provides basic live wallpapers, and the customisation possibilities are very antiquated and plain in contrast. We’ve had these animation customisation choices for years; it’s time for more.
Bloatware should also be considered. Both devices include pre-installed apps: the App Market on realme and the vAppStore on iQOO. However, realme makes it easy to disable these programs, but the iQOO 13 does not enable you to disable or remove most of them. You’re just given the choice of turning off alerts, which is very frustrating if you ask me. And don’t get me started on the Jovi Home situation.
So, while the iQOO 13 has an advantage when it comes to software updates, the realme GT 7 Pro wins when it comes to overall software performance. It is far more sophisticated, feature-rich, and customisable than iQOO 13. I’m not saying the iQOO 13’s software is bad; it’s just not on par with the Realme GT 7 Pro.
iQOO 13 vs. Realme GT 7 Pro: Performance and Gaming
Both the iQOO 13 and the realme GT 7 Pro use the Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, which is constructed on TSMC’s 3nm process and has the same clock speeds—2x 4.32 GHz and 6x 3.53 GHz cores. Despite this, the RAM and storage variances distinguish them.
The iQOO 13 features LPDDR5X Ultra RAM at 9.7 Gbps, as opposed to the realme GT 7 Pro’s normal LPDDR5X RAM. Storage-wise, iQOO supports UFS 4.1, but realme only supports UFS 4.0. Interestingly, the realme GT 7 Pro outperformed the AnTuTu storage tests.
Cooling solutions are also a significant feature. The realme GT 7 Pro has a bigger 11,480 mm² VC cooling chamber, whereas the iQOO 13 has a smaller 7,000 mm² system. Despite this, neither device experienced substantial overheating during heavy use.
Synthetic Benchmarks
Benchmark findings were mixed: iQOO outperformed in Geekbench 6 and the 3DMark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test, while realme performed better in storage tests. The CPU throttling and other testing were identical on both, with no significant differences.
Standard Modes
| Benchmark | iQOO 13 Regular | realme GT 7 Pro Non-GT |
| AnTuTu v10 | 27,23,687 | 27,21,980 |
| AnTuTu Storage Test | 1,95,629 | 2,91,829 |
| Geekbench 6 (CPU) | Single-Core: 2,988, Multi-Core: 9,167 | Single-Core: 2,888, Multi-Core: 9,062 |
| Geekbench 6 (GPU) | OpenCL: 18,212, Vulkan: 24,857 | OpenCL: 18,941, Vulkan: 21,841 |
| 3DMark Wildlife Extreme | 5,854 (Avg FPS: 35.06) | 6,053 (Avg FPS: 36.25) |
| 3DMark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test | Best Loop: 5,580, Lowest Loop: 3,345, Stability: 60% | Best Loop: 5,807, Lowest Loop: 4,526, Stability: 77.9% |
| CPU Throttling | Throttled to 74% (Avg GIPS: 265,689) | Throttled to 65% (Avg GIPS: 198,632) |
Performance Modes
| Benchmark | iQOO 13 Monster Mode | realme GT 7 Pro GT Mode |
| AnTuTu v10 | 27,37,451 | 27,34,614 |
| Geekbench 6 (CPU) | Single-Core: 3,010, Multi-Core: 9,205 | Single-Core: 2,848, Multi-Core: 8,832 |
| Geekbench 6 (GPU) | OpenCL: 18,032, Vulkan: 25,054 | OpenCL: 18,573, Vulkan: 24,657 |
| 3DMark Wildlife Extreme | 6,125 (Avg FPS: 36.68) | 5,944 (Avg FPS: 35.60) |
| 3DMark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test | Best Loop: 4,446, Lowest Loop: 3,335, Stability: 75% | Best Loop: 5,209, Lowest Loop: 4,192, Stability: 80.5% |
| CPU Throttling | Throttled to 72% (Avg GIPS: 322,706) | Throttled to 79% (Avg GIPS: 300,548) |
Gaming
In real-world gaming, both devices performed admirably, with consistent frame rates and low heating in the majority of popular games. Both offer AI resolution upscaling and frame interpolation, but the results were artificial and too crisp on both.
Notably, the iQOO 13 offers 144 Hz refresh rate and 120 FPS in BGMI. Furthermore, the Q2 chip allows you to live broadcast from the iQOO without impacting the phone’s frame rates or performance. If you really want to, you may connect the iQOO 13 to an external monitor and play the game in 2K 60 Hz.
| Game | iQOO 13 (FPS) | realme GT 7 Pro (FPS) |
| BGMI: Smooth + Extreme+ | 88.7 | 90 |
| Genshin Impact: Highest | 59.9 | 59.3 |
| Wuthering Waves: Highest | 58.4 | 57.8 |
| Honkai: Star Rail: Highest | 59.1 | 58.7 |
Warzone on the Realme GT 7 Pro, but was unable to do so on the iQOO since the game is now broken on both phones. Textures just do not load, and gameplay is not without bugs. Anyway, I was able to get 85-120 FPS on the Realme GT 7 Pro at peak settings, so anticipate the same on the iQOO 13.
iQOO has a tiny advantage with its bypass charging mode, which helps maintain battery health and reduces heat during long gaming sessions. Furthermore, its specialised Q2 chip improves network stability and provides stable FPS. However, the distinctions are minor, and both devices are powerful gaming computers.
iQOO 13 vs. Realme GT 7 Pro: Cameras
Both devices have comparable primary cameras, however performance varies. The iQOO 13 employs a 50 MP Sony IMX921 sensor (1/1.56-inch, f/1.88, 23 mm), whilst the realme GT 7 Pro employs the Sony IMX906 (1/1.56-inch, f/1.88, 24 mm). Both include OIS and autofocus, however image processing differs.
The RealMe GT 7 Pro delivers realistic colours but suffers with HDR, over-sharpening, and highlight management. In low light, the photographs lack vibrancy. The iQOO 13 prioritises bright colours, balanced details, and improved low-light performance, albeit its dynamic range may suffer.
Snapshot Mode
realme has AI Snapshot mode, which works, however I found it to significantly increase contrast. The iQOO 13 also includes Snapshot mode, although it’s hidden as a different mode (not ideal) under the Camera app. It produced somewhat less contrasty photos, but it struggled with very rapid moving scenes, as opposed to the realme, which performed flawlessly.
Ultra-wide
The iQOO 13 dominates the ultra-wide category, thanks to its 50 MP Samsung JN5 sensor and autofocus, which provide crisper, more detailed photographs and better macro shots. The realme GT 7 Pro’s 8 MP Sony IMX355 sensor is smaller and lacks focussing, leading in worse performance in all settings.
Telephoto
The iQOO 13 features a 2x optical zoom lens with no OIS and a smaller Sony IMX816 1/2.93-inch sensor. It functions well up to 4x, but after 6x, image quality degrades, and without stabilisation, hand blur becomes more visible, particularly in low light.
The realme GT 7 Pro performs better with its 3x periscope lens, which supports up to 120x zoom. While 120x isn’t ideal, it outperforms the iQOO 13, which can only go up to 30x. At 10x, the realme GT 7 Pro’s image quality much outperforms the iQOO 13, particularly in low light.
Interestingly, if you touch 2x, the iQOO 13 seldom ever utilises the 50 mm 2x lens in low light. The iQOO 13 employs the 50mm 2x lens when there is a lot of light or light sources; otherwise, it uses the primary lens’s 46mm 2x sensor reduction. If you press 3x, the realme utilises the 3x in practically all lighting situations. There is much room for improvement in the realme’s HDR throughout the day. The iQOO, on the other hand, struggles in low light, sometimes to the point where the pictures are unusable.
Macro
The iQOO 13’s ultra-wide camera captures macro images with precise results. When you go too near, Macro mode activates and switches to the ultra-wide lens. The minimal focussing distance of 50cm on the 2x lens makes it unsuitable for macro photography.
While distortion is obvious, the iQOO 13 shines at macro performance. However, the realme GT 7 Pro uses main-sensor cuts for macro photographs, resulting in oversharpened and unrealistic images.
Although detail may be somewhat improved by using the 1x or 2x lens, the quality is still inferior to that of the iQOO 13. It is not appropriate for macros since its 3x lens has a minimum focussing distance of 50 cm. Despite significant distortion, the iQOO 13 performs better overall in macro images.
Portraits
The realme GT 7 Pro is exceptional for portraits as it preserves details while capturing genuine skin tones. Three focal lengths are available for shooting: 1x (24mm), 2x (49mm), and 3x (73mm). I preferred the overall output over the iQOO 13, despite the fact that HDR sometimes be erratic.
However, the iQOO 13 has trouble staying consistent. Although it offers additional possibilities, such as numerous focal lengths (1x 24mm, 1.4x 35mm, 2x 50mm, and 4x 100mm), and may capture nice portraits, the results are very dependent on the illumination, with skin tones occasionally looking softened or overbright. In low light, the latter is particularly true.
Selfie
The iQOO 13 excels at taking selfies because of its 32 MP sensor with a 28mm focal length, which produces faces that seem natural and have great detail. The 16 MP selfie camera on the realme GT 7 Pro, which has a 24mm lens, takes respectable pictures, but it falls short in comparison.
Videos
The realme GT 7 Pro provides a more natural, neutral appearance for videos, while the iQOO 13 enhances colours and saturation. I don’t like either. While the realme can record 8K24 and the iQOO can record 8K30, neither device has enough stabilisation.
Stabilisation marginally increases in 4K30, but neither device performs very well. In contrast to the realme GT 7 Pro, which is limited to 1080p30 (ultra-wide to main to 3x), the iQOO 13 offers smooth lens switching in 4K (ultra-wide to main).
Except in Pro mode, the iQOO 13 trims films from the primary sensor rather than employing the 2x telephoto lens. The realme GT 7 Pro lets you to record in 4K with the optical 3x lens. Realme also has an advantage in that it supports Dolby Vision on both the primary and telephoto lenses.
The realme GT 7 Pro’s EIS provides improved stabilisation in selfie videos, although it only supports 1080p resolution. The iQOO 13 supports 4K30 and 4K60 resolutions, but has poor stabilisation, resulting in choppy output. The iQOO 13 may be suitable for stationary recording. HDR need work on both devices.
Additional Features with the Camera App
The iQOO 13 includes a Humanistic Street Photography mode, which adds a professional, camera-like feel to the experience. However, the actual camera app’s UI might be improved.
For example, the Live Photos feature would be more helpful if it were placed directly in the Photo mode rather being concealed in the Snapshot mode, which should also be in the Photos mode.
In comparison, the realme GT 7 Pro camera app is significantly more refined, with a cleaner, more user-friendly interface. It also has unique capabilities, such as an underwater mode, which might be handy in certain situations.
Quick Summary
The iQOO 13 is the superior option for overall image quality, selfies, and ultra-wide images. The Realme GT 7 Pro offers improved zoom and portrait. However, both phones have potential for development in certain areas. In its current condition, I would prefer the iQOO 13 to the Realme GT 7 Pro.
iQOO 13 vs. Realme GT 7 Pro: Charging and Battery Life
The realme GT 7 Pro retail model has a 5,800 mAh battery (compared to the 6,500 mAh in the review sample). With moderate use, the 6,500 mAh unit can provide roughly 8 hours of screen time, but intensive use, such as gaming and photography, cuts it to 5.5-6 hours.
The 120W fast charging takes around 40 minutes to completely charge, and the device supports 60W PD charging, while wireless charging is not available. Idle drain is a concern here, with some systems losing nearly 15% over 10 hours.
The iQOO 13 has a somewhat larger (or smaller, if we compare it to the 6,500 mAh model) 6,000 mAh battery, however it provides 8-9 hours of screen-on time with moderate use and 6-6.5 hours with intensive use.
However, idle drain is significantly greater, reaching between 20 and 30% after 10 hours. Charging speeds are remarkable, with the bundled 120W PD charger fully charging the battery in 30 minutes. Furthermore, it enables PD rapid charging. Wireless charging is also unavailable here.
iQOO 13 vs. realme GT 7 Pro: Pros and Cons
Here is a summary of everything you just read, along with advantages and disadvantages, to make things easier for you.
iQOO 13 Pros and Cons
Pros
- Lighter design (213g)
- Practical flat display
- 2K resolution, 144Hz refresh rate (gaming)
- LTPO actually works well
- 120W Flash Charge
- 360-degree NFC
- IP68 and IP69 ratings
- Software updates: 4 years OS, 5 years security
- Excellent performance
- More precise haptics
- Better selfie camera
- Better ultra-wide performance
- Main camera exhibits less oversharpening
- Better macro shots
- Humanistic street photography mode
- USB 3.2
- Good battery life
- PD charger included in the box (Type-C)
Cons
- Display oversaturation issue
- Less immersive display (flat)
- Funtouch OS 15 is still lacking
- Struggles with fast-moving subjects in Snapshot mode
- Limited zoom capability (30x)
- Video stabilization needs work
- 2x lens doesn’t have OIS
- High idle drain (20-30% over 10 hours)
- System bloatware can’t be uninstalled or disabled
realme GT 7 Pro Pros and Cons
Pros
- Premium quad-curved display
- 2000 Nits global brightness
- AI tools for photo editing
- Smoother UI experience
- Faster fingerprint registration
- More AI features (AI Writer, AI Speak, etc.)
- IP69 rating
- Great ultrasonic fingerprint scanner
- Excellent performance
- Good haptics
- Excellent speakers
- Better zoom capabilities (3x to 120x)
- Arguably better portrait mode performance
- Dolby Vision in video recording
- More stable selfie video (EIS)
- Cleaner camera app UI
- Underwater mode in camera app
- Good battery life
Cons
- Slightly bulkier (223g)
- Lower 1.5K resolution and LTPO tuning isn’t perfect
- Fewer OS updates (3 years OS, 4 years security)
- Struggles with HDR and highlight control
- 8 MP ultra-wide
- No 4K in selfies
- Weaker macro shots
- Camera needs further optimization
- Proprietary charger in the box (USB-A)
iQOO 13 vs. realme GT 7 Pro : Finally
| Parameter | iQOO 13 | realme GT 7 Pro |
| Design | 9/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Display & Speakers | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Biometrics | 8.5/10 | 8.7/10 |
| Software | 8/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Performance & Gaming | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Cameras | 7.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Battery Life & Charging | 8.5/10 | 8/10 |
| Overall | 8.7/10 | 8.2/10 |
The iQOO 13 provides a superior overall experience than the Realme GT 7 Pro, particularly in the cameras (excluding zoom)—ultra-wide, selfie, and macro capabilities. It’s also ₹5,000 cheaper at ₹55,000, making it a better balanced option. However, it has shortcomings like as display oversaturation, zoom difficulties, and the outdated-looking Funtouch OS, which may not appeal to many users.
The realme GT 7 Pro, priced at ₹60,000, has advantages like a quad-curved display, better UI, and superior zoom, but compromises on 1 less OS update, ultra-wide/selfie, macro quality, and includes a USB-A charger. If you’re okay with the iQOO 13’s OS limitations, it’s the clear winner. Go for the realme GT 7 Pro only if software is your priority or you find a great deal.
I’d choose the iQOO 13. Although I don’t like its operating system, I can’t compromise on camera performance. Furthermore, the reduced pricing, greater software updates, and the integrated PD charger are significant factors for me. How about you? Which one would you chose, and why? Please let me know in the comments section below.
